Negotiated Bid vs. Design-Bid-Build: What’s Right for Your Next Project?

Choosing how to deliver your project is one of the most consequential decisions you'll make as an owner. It affects your budget, your timeline, your stress levels, and the quality of the team you'll be working with for months or years. At HTG, we've guided clients through financial buildings, ice arenas, fitness centers, and community facilities of all kinds and here's what we've learned.

Clarifying Industry Terminology: "Traditional" Process

When clients say they want a "traditional" process, they almost always mean design-bid-build (DBB): design is completed first, contractors bid on the design, and the lowest bid wins. There's a common assumption that this is the only option or the surest way to stay competitive. Neither is quite true.

Before choosing a delivery method, it's worth asking yourself:

  • Is the lowest possible number your top priority, or do you want cost clarity from the very beginning?

  • Do you want to vet for experience and partnership, or just the cheapest option?

  • Does your project require specialized expertise, like refrigeration systems for an ice arena?

  • Is a faster timeline worth more than the absolute lowest cost?

  • Are you open to product recommendations from your builder, or do you have strict specs?

Your answers will point you in the right direction.

The Real Risks of Design-Bid-Build Today

The fundamental problem with DBB is that you don't get real pricing until your drawings are fully complete. If those numbers come back over budget, you're back to the drawing board, and lost time is lost revenue.

Without real-time construction insight, cost spikes and material shortages don't surface until bids come in. We've seen structural systems need to be completely re-engineered due to supply shifts.

There's also a built-in incentive problem: DBB rewards contractors for bidding low to win the job, then recovering costs through change orders. Your final price can end up well above that original bid.

The Negotiated Bid Approach

A negotiated bid brings the contractor in at the very beginning, as a full member of the project team alongside the architect and engineer, not after the drawings are done.

This is where our approach comes into play. We facilitate a formal interview process in which two to four shortlisted contractors each present their proposed budget, timeline, fee, team and project history before detailed design even begins. We compile a scorecard so owners can compare apples-to-apples: experience, budget, fees, personnel and fit. You choose your partner with your eyes open.

From there, the general contractor joins the design process to contribute real-time construction knowledge. When a structural system spikes in cost, the team knows immediately. When a design decision would significantly change the budget, you find out in a meeting, not after the drawings are done.

Subcontractor bidding still happens competitively at the end of design. Every trade is bid out, and HTG requires a fully open-book process; owners see every number from every trade, no exceptions. The general contractor’s fee is fixed upfront, so there's no incentive to inflate costs.

No More Budget Surprises

The biggest misconception about a negotiated bid is that you're locking in a price at the start. You're not, you're locking in a team. From there, you have the entire design phase to refine scope, make adjustments, and stay on target.

In DBB, you're chasing a budget with blinders on and won't know if you've hit it until the very end. With a negotiated bid, you establish the target early and do multiple price checks along the way. If the market shifts, you adjust. No redesigns, no expensive surprises, no lost months.

Why Team Dynamics Matter

Anyone in the industry has heard the stories: finger-pointing between architects and contractors, disputes over who missed what. Negotiated bids help prevent this by bringing the right team together from day one, with a shared investment in the outcome.

Working through months of design meetings together builds trust that simply can't be replicated when a contractor gets plugged in after the fact. The general contractor isn't just executing drawings; they helped create them. That changes everything about how a project feels during construction.

HTG has long-term construction partners we stand behind. We're in this for the long haul, and the negotiated bid brings the build team into that same long-term vision.

Which Method Is Right for You?

Design-Bid-Build may still make sense if your timeline is flexible, cost volatility won't significantly impact your budget, or if you're bound by municipal procurement requirements.

Negotiated Bid is our top recommendation for private owners, associations, and organizations seeking cost control, transparency, and a genuine partnership, especially in today's unpredictable market.

The Bottom Line

We're already seeing the majority of our projects move toward a negotiated bid. Clients who've been through the process consistently say the same thing: it was clearer, less stressful, and the relationships built along the way lasted well beyond construction.

Choose the right partner, not based on the lowest number, but based on who you want next to you when things get challenging. Every construction project has surprises. The right team will do the right thing, not just the cheap thing.


The HTG Difference

Navigating vendors, contractors, and construction decisions is a lot to manage on top of running your organization. That's where we come in.

At HTG, we've spent decades building relationships with contractors and vendors specializing in financial and recreational facilities. We're not just your architect; we're your total project coordinator, bringing the right people to the table, facilitating the process, and making sure you always have the information you need to make confident decisions. You stay focused on the vision. We'll handle the rest.

Kyle Pederson

With industry experience going back to 2012, Kyle brings his adaptable skill set and open mind to each new design as a Project Architect. He has supported, collaborated with, and led a wide variety of project teams, from schematics through completion, across building types ranging from recreation to restaurants, financial institutions, commercial, and beyond. Navigating construction budgets, code requirements, and the unique needs of each project make every day in this field a fresh opportunity to learn something new. Kyle uses these opportunities to build on his experience while working alongside clients and owners to craft designs that positively impact people and places.

Off the clock, Kyle enjoys camping, traveling, discovering new restaurants and breweries, and playing ice hockey in local and community leagues.

Previous
Previous

Designing for Year-Round Use: Beyond the Ice Season

Next
Next

Financing Considerations for Building an Ice Rink